Recently I had a friend asking about the true cause of polio.
She's not into the alternative, but she is now!
She searched for the factors that caused paralysis at the time.
All the search engines gave fact checks saying that there's no connection between polio and ddt/pesticides! 😂 🤡
Because of that, she suspected it.. before that, she had no idea that DDT was one of the reasons for the issues that was blamed on the bullshit virus lol.
Because of how blatant the fact checkers try to squeeze 10 lbs of shit in a 5 lb bag, it becomes obvious today to even her that there's something obscured.
Oh, so probing Green's family, work history, statements, upbringing, associations, cliques, beliefs, religion, roots, motivations, convictions gets us in trouble? So I call her a modern Jewish Fascist. Thought police thug of the highest order. A Israel First White Supremacist. A sociopath. Power hungry woman. A misandrist. A Goyim Nanny. A genocide backer and planner.
Yikes, so the ghosts in her dirty machines now have wormed there way into your Substack and have targeted me for elimination? Public humiliation? Financial disenfranchisement?
Ahh, here's her Zionist and Jewish Supremacist roots. In a longer bio
Great article. I think the whole concept of the “malinformation” should prove to us that the ruling class thinks of us as cattle, farmed, kept and unable (not allowed) to think for ourselves…
Thanks. Yeah, that very notion I think is very indicative of how its authors and purveyors actually look at people. And the medical terminology is stunningly explicit. Dissent is a virus, as John said.
I completely agree. (Incidentally, I’d rather be “sick” with the virus of dissent than in a “healthy” state of unquestioning obedience.) I think that the use of medical terminology is a dangerous game. Once a group of people are deemed “unwell”, there is justification for their mistreatment and censorship.
Geopolitics & Empire podcast had Jeffrey E. Paul on to discuss his latest book:
"Winning America's Second Civil War: Progressivism's Authoritarian Threat, Where It Came from, and How to Defeat it" on the roots of 'Progressivism' in the US and how it came from (unfortunately) Germany’s 'state socialist' academics (humans have no natural rights) and the fact that that's where rich Yankees went to get PhDs as Germany was apparently the 1st nation to establish those (doctoral) programs. There was something linking that and what came a few decades later in Germany (Austrian painter), also the fact that since there was an inversion of meaning or usage, in the sense that what is today called Conservative was once a Liberal and vice-versa.
Overview of the mentioned plus another title on the subject:
It finally provided me information which helped me put the massive transformation we've witnessed, esp in US society in the 30yrs I've lived there (1993 on), in context. Since I didn't go to college but obv saw it I first hand I felt I was missing something and that Prof Lyell Asher detailed history was just incredible.
Fortuitously righ after I watched an interview on UnHerd with (tenured) Harvard Prof Sandell with his book "The Tyranny of Meritocracy" .
Incredibly the video was titled "Why the Elites don't Deserve their Titles" and listening to Harvard Prof exposition of his ideas it seemed clear that the irony was lost on himself as to the fact that in my eyes he fit the video's title to a t
Way I read Prof Sandel's 'Meritocracy is a Tyranny' is that it may be that Meritocracy if applied would make it harder for the Prof Sandells of this world to have tenured position at Harvard. Oh lastly I was stunned seeing that while Prof Sandell is not only a tenured Harvard Prof but also an internationally known author, with publishing deals, book signings and a very long Wikipedia entry, Prof Asher doesn't even have a Wikipedia page at all !! Apologies for the lengthy comment/message
"they don’t really consider us sovereign human persons..." That got me thinking About the Jeffrey Paul 'Winning The second Civil War' about the history of American Progressivism and how it turned into today's Liberal Establishment.
Can't wait to read, been bothered by the whole thing as if you take that issue and add the whole visual, deep fakes within still pics or moving images, plus AI what I see is 'they' are ensuring that literally nobody will take anything at face value, including what should be so that if the dissonancenso far manifested via the questioning of the 'sources' (I'm often told that my sources aren't to he trusted by NY Times subscribers) soon there will be a few more strong reason to delegitimize any information outside the official narrative, as ridiculous as it may be..
That's a good point. The loss of trust that will be exacerbated by the Gen-AI-deepfake process will in turn call for more heavy-handed attempts at delegitimizing dissent.
It's not working.
Recently I had a friend asking about the true cause of polio.
She's not into the alternative, but she is now!
She searched for the factors that caused paralysis at the time.
All the search engines gave fact checks saying that there's no connection between polio and ddt/pesticides! 😂 🤡
Because of that, she suspected it.. before that, she had no idea that DDT was one of the reasons for the issues that was blamed on the bullshit virus lol.
Because of how blatant the fact checkers try to squeeze 10 lbs of shit in a 5 lb bag, it becomes obvious today to even her that there's something obscured.
Oh, so probing Green's family, work history, statements, upbringing, associations, cliques, beliefs, religion, roots, motivations, convictions gets us in trouble? So I call her a modern Jewish Fascist. Thought police thug of the highest order. A Israel First White Supremacist. A sociopath. Power hungry woman. A misandrist. A Goyim Nanny. A genocide backer and planner.
Yikes, so the ghosts in her dirty machines now have wormed there way into your Substack and have targeted me for elimination? Public humiliation? Financial disenfranchisement?
Ahh, here's her Zionist and Jewish Supremacist roots. In a longer bio
https://www.influencewatch.org/person/yasmin-green/
A monster by any other name is a skinny jeans and hipster fascist.
Is the comment you're refering to deleted? I don't really get the context here
Great article. I think the whole concept of the “malinformation” should prove to us that the ruling class thinks of us as cattle, farmed, kept and unable (not allowed) to think for ourselves…
Thanks. Yeah, that very notion I think is very indicative of how its authors and purveyors actually look at people. And the medical terminology is stunningly explicit. Dissent is a virus, as John said.
I completely agree. (Incidentally, I’d rather be “sick” with the virus of dissent than in a “healthy” state of unquestioning obedience.) I think that the use of medical terminology is a dangerous game. Once a group of people are deemed “unwell”, there is justification for their mistreatment and censorship.
I could not say that better myself. When you start to pathologize dissent, there's no space for a rational criticism of authority.
Foucault's early work is a great exploration of these tendencies. Madness and Civilization is very well worth a read, but it's pretty dense.
I enjoy dense books, so I will put it on my reading list. Thank you for the recommendation!
Geopolitics & Empire podcast had Jeffrey E. Paul on to discuss his latest book:
"Winning America's Second Civil War: Progressivism's Authoritarian Threat, Where It Came from, and How to Defeat it" on the roots of 'Progressivism' in the US and how it came from (unfortunately) Germany’s 'state socialist' academics (humans have no natural rights) and the fact that that's where rich Yankees went to get PhDs as Germany was apparently the 1st nation to establish those (doctoral) programs. There was something linking that and what came a few decades later in Germany (Austrian painter), also the fact that since there was an inversion of meaning or usage, in the sense that what is today called Conservative was once a Liberal and vice-versa.
Overview of the mentioned plus another title on the subject:
https://thegivingreview.com/philanthropic-captains-progressive-crews/
But this presentation blew me away:
https://youtu.be/0hybqg81n-M?si=VAHjNWUgZVdIVmhp
It finally provided me information which helped me put the massive transformation we've witnessed, esp in US society in the 30yrs I've lived there (1993 on), in context. Since I didn't go to college but obv saw it I first hand I felt I was missing something and that Prof Lyell Asher detailed history was just incredible.
https://youtu.be/0hybqg81n-M?si=0iHevkKy4Bc-FZ_G
Fortuitously righ after I watched an interview on UnHerd with (tenured) Harvard Prof Sandell with his book "The Tyranny of Meritocracy" .
Incredibly the video was titled "Why the Elites don't Deserve their Titles" and listening to Harvard Prof exposition of his ideas it seemed clear that the irony was lost on himself as to the fact that in my eyes he fit the video's title to a t
https://youtu.be/6zY2re7FE0w?si=JaDZDujc7CWrO_bs
Way I read Prof Sandel's 'Meritocracy is a Tyranny' is that it may be that Meritocracy if applied would make it harder for the Prof Sandells of this world to have tenured position at Harvard. Oh lastly I was stunned seeing that while Prof Sandell is not only a tenured Harvard Prof but also an internationally known author, with publishing deals, book signings and a very long Wikipedia entry, Prof Asher doesn't even have a Wikipedia page at all !! Apologies for the lengthy comment/message
Great post, thanks 🙏
Thanks yourself!
"they don’t really consider us sovereign human persons..." That got me thinking About the Jeffrey Paul 'Winning The second Civil War' about the history of American Progressivism and how it turned into today's Liberal Establishment.
Can't wait to read, been bothered by the whole thing as if you take that issue and add the whole visual, deep fakes within still pics or moving images, plus AI what I see is 'they' are ensuring that literally nobody will take anything at face value, including what should be so that if the dissonancenso far manifested via the questioning of the 'sources' (I'm often told that my sources aren't to he trusted by NY Times subscribers) soon there will be a few more strong reason to delegitimize any information outside the official narrative, as ridiculous as it may be..
That's a good point. The loss of trust that will be exacerbated by the Gen-AI-deepfake process will in turn call for more heavy-handed attempts at delegitimizing dissent.
Thanks!