Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Rob (c137)'s avatar

This is why virology is full of logical fallacies... Specialization requires following what others have "proven". I heard Stephanie Senff on the highwire this week and got so tired of the jibber jabber about prions ("misfolded proteins") somehow damaging brain cells after the jabs. Mind you, she was repeating that it was a theory, yet acting like this is indeed what causes brain damage.

(In truth, the damaged/toxified brain cells give off damaged proteins, which somehow these brain trusts think is the cause of the damage, just like virology)

Ummm, had she not been so obsessed about this specialty, perhaps she would know the simple fking truth:

The toxic crap in the vaccines cause cell damage, leading to many conditions.

I also find the same brain trust idiocy in economics and physics. It's a result of being forced to cram for tests and papers for years, with little to no real world application until years later.

That's why science is dead

Liam scheff on some issues with modern "science" and "sci-copaths"

https://youtu.be/7ZBflv-1k5k

Expand full comment
WeepingWillow's avatar

Humans in their undomesticated state are about as generalist as can be. Even in more complex societies of the past, a blacksmith still had to be able to repair his house, grow a portion of his food, defend his family, make and care for his tools and do a bit of hunting on the side. The default setting was Jack of all trades master of one (not none) which is not what we are led to believe in the modern world.

What interests me is what do those who resist the system have in common? What traits allow us to say no?

Expand full comment
11 more comments...

No posts